How and why, does a Meritorious Bootcamp Graduate go from that to giving up on their own branch and trying to transfer at 22, to another branch to save himself and be patriotic and still hold on to a dream, he had when he joined at 18
--------------------------
----------------------
This may meander. For the military mind it may seem chaotic. I am trying to put many complex pieces together and reduce it to something understandable.
Please look it over. Reach out and give suggestions if you don't mind. I believe someone in the military who cares about right and wrong and making the system better will reach out.
--------------------------------
I tried to transfer to the f-king army to get out of it by the way and these people who call themselves American even found a way to diminish this reality in federal court. This is not American. may need President Trump in on this one. Please support. I am getting railroaded.
--------------------------
The USS SIDES was not a regular FFG, it was a NRF FFG. I had a SAM contract. This combo has never been seen ever in Navy history. The Navy can not produce another example. It was isolating and dementing. The board talks about equity. The DOD here shows my Navy Resume was "EVOLUTION" and shut it all down. I needed help guys.
--------------------------------
Evolution of the Military Current
Active-Reserve Force Mix
“ Navy initiated the Sea/Air Mariner (SAM) program…proved unsuccessful because its benefits and
6-year obligation compared unfavorably with Army and Air Force programs.66”
“starting in 1985, the Navy added new FFG-7 Oliver Hazard Perry class guided
missile frigates to the NRF.” “After 1993, the difficulties of maintaining the NRF ships with part-time crews and the
declining number of ships in the Navy led to significant reductions in the NRF.” only one FFG of the Perry Class remains in the NRF…the FFGs have been part of the Navy’s Battle Force (assigned to the Fleet
Forces Command) and have
conducted operations in the same manner as other active Navy ships. The last of these FFGs, the
USS Kauffman, will be decommissioned in September 2015.151”
----------------------
(GOVERNMENT STATEMENT-ignoring the reports and generalizing s if this was normal based on equity-as if everyone had this resume and experience )
"Certainly, your experience onboard the U.S.S. SIDES was an injustice and your resulting
mental health conditions are a tragedy….There simply is no injustice in the fact that you did not receive a medical
retirement as a result of your conditions, because your conditions never warranted referral to the
DES much less rendered you unfit for continued service. The Board also found no equitable
basis for relief in your case. In determining what constitutes equity, the Board is obligated to
consider not only what you should receive, but also what other similarly situated service
members are entitled to receive. The Board determined that no other similarly situated service
member would have been referred to the DES at the time even with the facts as they are now
known, nor would anyone be retroactively medically retired based upon similar facts.
Accordingly, the Board determined that there is no basis for relief based on equity. The Board
continues to regret the experience that you endured during your service onboard the U.S.S.
SIDES and the long-term effect that it has had upon your mental health. Finally, the Board members
recognized that you continued to serve the Navy honorably despite the trauma that you endured
onboard the U.S.S. SIDES. That, however, is the point. Medical retirements are intended only
for those service member unable to continue providing such honorable and effective service due
to a disqualifying medical condition. The Board regrettably found no basis to grant you the
medical retirement that you were never qualified to receive."
----------------------------------------------
("contrary to established Navy policy and tradition." Thus was your leadership and command and experience in the surface force, as reviewed by the Navy itself)
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
Monterey, California
NAVAL RESERVE: AN ORGANIZATION IN TRANSITION
Richard C. Mazza
September 1992
A. MANAGEMENT
In 1988, Naval Reserve CINCPACFLT Detachment 420
(CINCPACFLT DET 420) conducted a management review and
organizational analysis of the Naval Reserve. The CINCPACFLT
Det 420 Management Assistance Team (MAT) was tasked by the
Director of Naval Reserve to conduct this analysis. Although
the emphasis was on the Naval Reserve Surface Force and
CNAVRES organization as a whole, their analysis addressed
issues encountered by the Naval Air Reserve Force as well.
The MAT findings maintained that the administrative and
organizational problems facing the Naval Reserve were a result
of the Naval Reserve operating contrary to established Navy
principles of leadership, command, chain of command, teamwork,
completed staff work, and career incentives. (CINCPACFLT DET
420, 1988)
The MAT found that there was a prevailing failure to
comply with CNAVRES policy throughout the Naval Reserve.
Equally as serious as this non-compliance was the toleration
of willful non-compliance. Organizational disconnects, as
well as a lack of standardized command selection criteria,
were noted as a contributory factor in the observed widespread
lack of leadership.
The lack of organizational vigor in the Naval Reserve was
attributed to the double and triple hatting of commanders at
various echelons of command.
Numerous violations of the traditional notion of chain of
command were noted in which clear lines of authority and
responsibility were diffused through a myriad of "stove pipe"
commands within the Naval Reserve. The lack of
standardization of command authority and responsibility was
contrary to established Navy policy and tradition.
Fragmentation and rivalries between different segments of
the Naval Reserve has led to a breakdown of the traditional
concept of teamwork. This fragmentation has led to localized
politicalization of various reserve commands in which policies
and directives are promulgated that are not necessarily
consistent with the mission of the Naval Reserve.
The MAT also noted a consistent lack of completed staff
work among the various levels of the Naval Reserve. Although
the MAT could not pin down the exact cause, it was speculated
that poor morale could be the cause of poor staffwork or that
poor staffwork could be a factor in poor morale. Poor
staffwork prior to the establishment of significant changes in
reserve policy or command authority has, in the past, led to
unnecessary administrative duplication, and prolonged
confusion over lines of legitimate command authority and
responsibility.
The MAT found that there were no criteria for selection of
qualified surface TARs in key reserve management positions.
Many positions on the CNAVRES and COMNAVSURFRESFOR staffs were
occupied by individuals with no field management experience.
Conversely, many in key field positions had no experience at
CNAVRES or COMNAVSURFRESFOR. The lack of an institutionalized
career path and reward system was cited as a deficiency in the
proper career development in the surface TAR community.
--------------------------------
The Title
I won't give you enough to pay to live, you will not get a DD214-the VA will fight you- and assign you 18, "part time" to an undermanned active duty combat ship
I try to now compare what I went through to what I am now understanding of other branches.
If the Air Force or Army, had a jet, or helicopter, that could do 48 hour, at a minimum up to a couple of weeks, operational in flight "training" missions, in turbulence and put a 18 year kid on there, and send him home, with all sorts of motion illness, at a minimum, with reserve pay compensation, and call that "Training" repeated for 5 years,
I think the Army and Air Force have better reserve programs. The DOD even comments on it below in comparison to the program I was in that the Navy Shut Down.
Is this normal? The Federal Court and the Navy Board does not want to touch it or talk about it, although there are many military reports on DTIC . Mil about it.
I start out with a question.
Would the Navy ever assign a kid in rotc to an active duty combat ship part time obligated? Of court not and for obvious reasons. So why do this to an enlisted 18 year old kid with in a reserve contract, without acknowledging the obvious problems that would most likely injure?
This is in Federal Court--The same Court that has vaccine injury cases with possibly 1% relief granted-I study military pay cases in the same system-There is not one that was granted relief in the first instance no matter how extreme. I believe my story is beyond extreme-as in rare-and I put it out for anyone to challenge me-and prove me wrong
"I will give you nothing end expect everything"
You might join the reserves at 18 in a lull between wars 1994, 18 to go to college on a reserve GI Bill to commission by 22, and go active, You graduate bootcamp meritorious. You might expect to go to a reserve center from there again to do the reserve thing
18 year old weekend warrior pay reserve. Annual far below poverty
Never in your mind, would you understand or believe or comprehend that poverty pay and benefits Assigned to A undermanned active duty combat ship, part time.
The Board Of Correction Navy Records
The Navy can not produce another resume like this. No one has challenged me on this.
The Navy can not point to any time in history before then or after where a kid is assigned a active duty combat ship part time for 5 years
--------------------------
----------------------
This may meander. For the military mind it may seem chaotic. I am trying to put many complex pieces together and reduce it to something understandable.
Please look it over. Reach out and give suggestions if you don't mind. I believe someone in the military who cares about right and wrong and making the system better will reach out.
--------------------------------
I tried to transfer to the f-king army to get out of it by the way and these people who call themselves American even found a way to diminish this reality in federal court. This is not American. may need President Trump in on this one. Please support. I am getting railroaded.
--------------------------
The USS SIDES was not a regular FFG, it was a NRF FFG. I had a SAM contract. This combo has never been seen ever in Navy history. The Navy can not produce another example. It was isolating and dementing. The board talks about equity. The DOD here shows my Navy Resume was "EVOLUTION" and shut it all down. I needed help guys.
--------------------------------
Evolution of the Military Current
Active-Reserve Force Mix
“ Navy initiated the Sea/Air Mariner (SAM) program…proved unsuccessful because its benefits and
6-year obligation compared unfavorably with Army and Air Force programs.66”
“starting in 1985, the Navy added new FFG-7 Oliver Hazard Perry class guided
missile frigates to the NRF.” “After 1993, the difficulties of maintaining the NRF ships with part-time crews and the
declining number of ships in the Navy led to significant reductions in the NRF.” only one FFG of the Perry Class remains in the NRF…the FFGs have been part of the Navy’s Battle Force (assigned to the Fleet
Forces Command) and have
conducted operations in the same manner as other active Navy ships. The last of these FFGs, the
USS Kauffman, will be decommissioned in September 2015.151”
----------------------
(GOVERNMENT STATEMENT-ignoring the reports and generalizing s if this was normal based on equity-as if everyone had this resume and experience )
"Certainly, your experience onboard the U.S.S. SIDES was an injustice and your resulting
mental health conditions are a tragedy….There simply is no injustice in the fact that you did not receive a medical
retirement as a result of your conditions, because your conditions never warranted referral to the
DES much less rendered you unfit for continued service. The Board also found no equitable
basis for relief in your case. In determining what constitutes equity, the Board is obligated to
consider not only what you should receive, but also what other similarly situated service
members are entitled to receive. The Board determined that no other similarly situated service
member would have been referred to the DES at the time even with the facts as they are now
known, nor would anyone be retroactively medically retired based upon similar facts.
Accordingly, the Board determined that there is no basis for relief based on equity. The Board
continues to regret the experience that you endured during your service onboard the U.S.S.
SIDES and the long-term effect that it has had upon your mental health. Finally, the Board members
recognized that you continued to serve the Navy honorably despite the trauma that you endured
onboard the U.S.S. SIDES. That, however, is the point. Medical retirements are intended only
for those service member unable to continue providing such honorable and effective service due
to a disqualifying medical condition. The Board regrettably found no basis to grant you the
medical retirement that you were never qualified to receive."
----------------------------------------------
("contrary to established Navy policy and tradition." Thus was your leadership and command and experience in the surface force, as reviewed by the Navy itself)
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
Monterey, California
NAVAL RESERVE: AN ORGANIZATION IN TRANSITION
Richard C. Mazza
September 1992
A. MANAGEMENT
In 1988, Naval Reserve CINCPACFLT Detachment 420
(CINCPACFLT DET 420) conducted a management review and
organizational analysis of the Naval Reserve. The CINCPACFLT
Det 420 Management Assistance Team (MAT) was tasked by the
Director of Naval Reserve to conduct this analysis. Although
the emphasis was on the Naval Reserve Surface Force and
CNAVRES organization as a whole, their analysis addressed
issues encountered by the Naval Air Reserve Force as well.
The MAT findings maintained that the administrative and
organizational problems facing the Naval Reserve were a result
of the Naval Reserve operating contrary to established Navy
principles of leadership, command, chain of command, teamwork,
completed staff work, and career incentives. (CINCPACFLT DET
420, 1988)
The MAT found that there was a prevailing failure to
comply with CNAVRES policy throughout the Naval Reserve.
Equally as serious as this non-compliance was the toleration
of willful non-compliance. Organizational disconnects, as
well as a lack of standardized command selection criteria,
were noted as a contributory factor in the observed widespread
lack of leadership.
The lack of organizational vigor in the Naval Reserve was
attributed to the double and triple hatting of commanders at
various echelons of command.
Numerous violations of the traditional notion of chain of
command were noted in which clear lines of authority and
responsibility were diffused through a myriad of "stove pipe"
commands within the Naval Reserve. The lack of
standardization of command authority and responsibility was
contrary to established Navy policy and tradition.
Fragmentation and rivalries between different segments of
the Naval Reserve has led to a breakdown of the traditional
concept of teamwork. This fragmentation has led to localized
politicalization of various reserve commands in which policies
and directives are promulgated that are not necessarily
consistent with the mission of the Naval Reserve.
The MAT also noted a consistent lack of completed staff
work among the various levels of the Naval Reserve. Although
the MAT could not pin down the exact cause, it was speculated
that poor morale could be the cause of poor staffwork or that
poor staffwork could be a factor in poor morale. Poor
staffwork prior to the establishment of significant changes in
reserve policy or command authority has, in the past, led to
unnecessary administrative duplication, and prolonged
confusion over lines of legitimate command authority and
responsibility.
The MAT found that there were no criteria for selection of
qualified surface TARs in key reserve management positions.
Many positions on the CNAVRES and COMNAVSURFRESFOR staffs were
occupied by individuals with no field management experience.
Conversely, many in key field positions had no experience at
CNAVRES or COMNAVSURFRESFOR. The lack of an institutionalized
career path and reward system was cited as a deficiency in the
proper career development in the surface TAR community.
--------------------------------
The Title
I won't give you enough to pay to live, you will not get a DD214-the VA will fight you- and assign you 18, "part time" to an undermanned active duty combat ship
I try to now compare what I went through to what I am now understanding of other branches.
If the Air Force or Army, had a jet, or helicopter, that could do 48 hour, at a minimum up to a couple of weeks, operational in flight "training" missions, in turbulence and put a 18 year kid on there, and send him home, with all sorts of motion illness, at a minimum, with reserve pay compensation, and call that "Training" repeated for 5 years,
I think the Army and Air Force have better reserve programs. The DOD even comments on it below in comparison to the program I was in that the Navy Shut Down.
Is this normal? The Federal Court and the Navy Board does not want to touch it or talk about it, although there are many military reports on DTIC . Mil about it.
I start out with a question.
Would the Navy ever assign a kid in rotc to an active duty combat ship part time obligated? Of court not and for obvious reasons. So why do this to an enlisted 18 year old kid with in a reserve contract, without acknowledging the obvious problems that would most likely injure?
This is in Federal Court--The same Court that has vaccine injury cases with possibly 1% relief granted-I study military pay cases in the same system-There is not one that was granted relief in the first instance no matter how extreme. I believe my story is beyond extreme-as in rare-and I put it out for anyone to challenge me-and prove me wrong
"I will give you nothing end expect everything"
You might join the reserves at 18 in a lull between wars 1994, 18 to go to college on a reserve GI Bill to commission by 22, and go active, You graduate bootcamp meritorious. You might expect to go to a reserve center from there again to do the reserve thing
18 year old weekend warrior pay reserve. Annual far below poverty
Never in your mind, would you understand or believe or comprehend that poverty pay and benefits Assigned to A undermanned active duty combat ship, part time.
The Board Of Correction Navy Records
The Navy can not produce another resume like this. No one has challenged me on this.
The Navy can not point to any time in history before then or after where a kid is assigned a active duty combat ship part time for 5 years