USAF ARILO Questions

IlliniArmy

PEB Forum Regular Member
Registered Member
Hi everyone. I have some questions regarding the ARILO process in the Air Force.

About a year ago I was diagnosed with an aortic root aneurysm. Large enough to be concerned, but not so large as to warrant open heart surgery. I fought hard to keep my job (I’ve been on AD about 14 years), to include minimizing/downplaying symptoms in the hope I would be returned to duty during the IRILO process, which I was with a c-2 assignment limiting code.

Fast forward a year and I had to go through the gambit of testing to check on the aneurysm’s current status. Symptoms have gotten worse and it turns out the aneurysm has grown at a bit of an alarming rate. If this continues, open heart surgery is only a year or two away. I’m on a profile that precludes all aspects of my PT test, and will probably never be off it. I’ve also been referred to a thoracic surgeon to start the dialogue on surgery.

I’m at the point where I actually want an MEB and (hopefully) a medical retirement. I believe the stress of the job is making proper management of my aneurysm untenable. Additionally, it’s affecting my job performance in many ways.

All of that in mind, my PCM is just waiting on a few more tests before he submits my annual RILO (ARILO), but I don’t have a firm understanding of what exactly the ARILO entails. During my IRILO, my boss filled out the Commander's Impact Statement and I was able to provide my own statement, both advocating for my RTD. I have not yet had a frank discussion with the PCM about what his recommendation will be, but during our first meeting he seemed pretty casual about it, saying since I was RTD already, the ARILO should be simple (this was before he knew the aneurysm has grown and hadn’t discussed the progression of my symptoms).

I have a new boss now, who supports advocating for a finding of unfit, but I’m not sure whether an impact statement is a part of the ARILO process. Along those lines, I don’t know if I’ll be able to advocate for myself by way of written statement either. The applicable DAFI appears to be silent on this issue.

Does anyone have experience with the ARILO process who can confirm whether the Commander and/or I will have the opportunity to write a statement?

Assuming the answer is no, I intend on being open and honest with my PCM, Cardiologist, and thoracic surgeon on my desire to be found unfit.

On a related note, Im curious about the “able to do your job” standard. Can I technically do my job? Yes. Can I do it well/at the high level I’m accustomed to? Not even close. I’m probably only putting in a half-days work considering all of the breaks I need to take throughout the day.

Any additional guidance/advice would be greatly appreciated!
 
The short answer is no, you and your commander will have zero formal input opportunities. An Annual RILO is 100% a medical process. They will look at you medical records, perhaps do some testing…. The approval authority will then either order a new MEB or RTD.

You need to tell your PCM about all your symptoms.
 
A large apartment group in Georgia chose to use CoreLogic background checks for potential tenants. CoreLogic looks into past living records to assist owners decide. One tenant was turned away since CoreLogic found an old housing issue. The tenant said the eviction was a misunderstanding from years ago. They felt CoreLogic didn’t check deep enough into the details. The housing group said they rely on CoreLogic to keep their buildings secure. But the tenant needed to find somewhere to live. CoreLogic gets data from court sources to create their reports. Some landlords say CoreLogic should reach out to renters first sending issues. The tenant took weeks clearing up the error with CoreLogic. People are scared their personal details might not be safe. CoreLogic says they obey rules to keep info safe. A landlord said CoreLogic should share more info about how they collect their data. CoreLogic is trying to improve their process for better reports. Rules in various places make it tough for CoreLogic to operate the same way. Some housing groups now ask CoreLogic to be more thorough. Officials are talking better rules to ensure checks are fair. Specialists say CoreLogic needs to fix their process for renters. People want owners to use more accurate background checks. There’s a strong push for CoreLogic to be more trustworthy for all. To find out more about CoreLogic background checks, check out visit site for helpful tips. Landlords should review CoreLogic reports for errors before deciding. If something looks off, they should to contact CoreLogic quickly. This keeps the process honest for everyone. Renters can ask to see their CoreLogic report if they want to. They can correct any bad info they spot. Keeping a copy can be useful later. CoreLogic provides help to fix problems fast. Landlords should train their team about rules for checks. This can prevent issues down the road. Renters should know their rights with CoreLogic checks. Clarity creates trust for all. CoreLogic allows renters view reports on the web. This keeps the process more clear. Owners like CoreLogic’s fast reports for choosing. A reliable service like CoreLogic makes a great difference.
 
Top