Below is an email I sent to my DoD/Congress/VSO contacts about this issue.
http://www.pebforum.com/site/threads/after-the-pdbr.10947/page-5
See the issue about SBP beginning with post 86 of the above thread. In short, those retired via the PDBR are being billed for SBP premiums backdated to the date of retirement. This does not seem right. Unless the spouse declines coverage, SBP should only be billed from the date the record was corrected by the Service. Why are they being billed to cover a risk that cannot possible occur - dying between the date of separation and the date the record was corrected via the PDBR. SBP also has a provision to drop out between the two and three year point post retirement. How are those retroactively retired via the PDBR or correction board given this option? How are those retroactively retired being properly briefed about SBP options?
Wounded warriors are being blindsided by this issue.
V/R,
Michael A. Parker
LTC, USA (Retired)
Wounded Warrior Advocate
I will let you know if I hear anything back.
Ed, I have to disagree with you. Congress is exactly where you want to go to amend a law to adjust for unforeseen situations.
The bottom line is that there needs to be a well established procedure to ensure those who are retired retroactively are given the proper information to make a well informed decision about SBP. If a member declines but fails to get spousal consent, DFAS should contact the member and spouse to clarify the issue rather that start SBP. DFAS should not be hitting members up with multi-thousand dollar bills for past SBP premiums. Rather they should start SBP premiums when the record is corrected. There is no sense in having to pay to cover a risk that will not happen (There is a chance I will die today but a zero percent chance I will die yesterday).
If a member is retroactively retired he often will not get an increase in compensation because the VA compensation wipes out the DoD disability benefit. These members are not getting any additional compensation but they are getting whacked with a multi-thousand dollar bill to cover the risk they might have died in the past. Ridiculous! If SBP is desired, start the coverage and the premiums the date the record is fixed and continue to pay for 30 years or age 72, whichever comes last, just like other retirees.
When I retired for length of service in 2006, I received deep details multiple times on the SBP program. After deep analysis, my wife and I opted for child only SBP due primarily to the young age of the children and the odds that she would receive VA DIC should I die. DIC offsets spousal SBP. By getting child only coverage, my family would collect both SBP and DIC without offset.
We made a well informed decision tailored to out specific circumstances based on deep details provided in retirement classes. Those retroactively retired deserve to be able to make well informed SBP decisions based on good information and counseling. Mailing them a SBP option form in a stack of retirement information papers tens years after separating from the military is not taking care of wounded warriors.
Finally, SBP participants are allowed to opt out of SBP between he 24th and 36th month of coverage. Absent a time machine, how in the world is a member who is retroactively retired ten years past going to exercise this option? If, instead, SPB coverage and premiums began as of the date the record was corrected, the member could exercise the SBP opt out option 24-36 months past this date.
Mike
http://www.pebforum.com/site/threads/after-the-pdbr.10947/page-5
See the issue about SBP beginning with post 86 of the above thread. In short, those retired via the PDBR are being billed for SBP premiums backdated to the date of retirement. This does not seem right. Unless the spouse declines coverage, SBP should only be billed from the date the record was corrected by the Service. Why are they being billed to cover a risk that cannot possible occur - dying between the date of separation and the date the record was corrected via the PDBR. SBP also has a provision to drop out between the two and three year point post retirement. How are those retroactively retired via the PDBR or correction board given this option? How are those retroactively retired being properly briefed about SBP options?
Wounded warriors are being blindsided by this issue.
V/R,
Michael A. Parker
LTC, USA (Retired)
Wounded Warrior Advocate
I will let you know if I hear anything back.
Ed, I have to disagree with you. Congress is exactly where you want to go to amend a law to adjust for unforeseen situations.
The bottom line is that there needs to be a well established procedure to ensure those who are retired retroactively are given the proper information to make a well informed decision about SBP. If a member declines but fails to get spousal consent, DFAS should contact the member and spouse to clarify the issue rather that start SBP. DFAS should not be hitting members up with multi-thousand dollar bills for past SBP premiums. Rather they should start SBP premiums when the record is corrected. There is no sense in having to pay to cover a risk that will not happen (There is a chance I will die today but a zero percent chance I will die yesterday).
If a member is retroactively retired he often will not get an increase in compensation because the VA compensation wipes out the DoD disability benefit. These members are not getting any additional compensation but they are getting whacked with a multi-thousand dollar bill to cover the risk they might have died in the past. Ridiculous! If SBP is desired, start the coverage and the premiums the date the record is fixed and continue to pay for 30 years or age 72, whichever comes last, just like other retirees.
When I retired for length of service in 2006, I received deep details multiple times on the SBP program. After deep analysis, my wife and I opted for child only SBP due primarily to the young age of the children and the odds that she would receive VA DIC should I die. DIC offsets spousal SBP. By getting child only coverage, my family would collect both SBP and DIC without offset.
We made a well informed decision tailored to out specific circumstances based on deep details provided in retirement classes. Those retroactively retired deserve to be able to make well informed SBP decisions based on good information and counseling. Mailing them a SBP option form in a stack of retirement information papers tens years after separating from the military is not taking care of wounded warriors.
Finally, SBP participants are allowed to opt out of SBP between he 24th and 36th month of coverage. Absent a time machine, how in the world is a member who is retroactively retired ten years past going to exercise this option? If, instead, SPB coverage and premiums began as of the date the record was corrected, the member could exercise the SBP opt out option 24-36 months past this date.
Mike