Jason Perry
Founder and Leader
Site Founder
Staff Member
PEB Forum Veteran
Lifetime Supporter
Registered Member
Timely decisions hard to find at Veterans Affairs
By CHRIS ADAMS
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON | The Department of Veterans Affairs fell further behind this year in its attempts to give veterans timely decisions on their disability claims, new records show.
The latest numbers are in an annual performance report the VA prepares for Congress. Overall, the agency either has fallen behind or has made no progress in improving its performance in more than half of what it lists as its key goals.
In its speed of processing disability claims, the agency lost ground for the third year in a row.
Moreover, McClatchy Newspapers has found that the VA put a positive spin on many of its numbers and in two instances provided Congress with incorrect or incomplete figures.
The agency said it took an average of 183 days to process a claim in fiscal 2007, longer than in any of the five years tracked in the report. Processing exceeded its 2007 goal of 160 days and its long-term goal of eventually reducing processing time to 125 days.
Congress and veterans closely watch the time it takes the VA to process claims, and the agency has vowed in previous years to pick up the pace. When it was asked about its processing speed last year, for example, the VA told McClatchy that hiring new workers would help it increase production and decrease its backlog of claims in 2007.
In fact, processing time increased by an average of six days, and the backlog of pending claims rose from 377,681 to 391,257, the agency’s records show.
The VA said this week that it was aggressively tackling the issue, hiring more than 1,000 workers, boosting overtime and revamping training. The agency also said it was receiving more disability claims than it had at any time in recent history and that it had received more than it had expected in 2007.
Beyond that, the agency said that meeting or exceeding its goals wasn’t always the best measure of success.
“The VA sets goals to measure how we are doing so that we can continuously improve performance,” said Bob Henke, assistant secretary for management. “We use goals to move and improve performance.”
But for Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, the report is more evidence that the agency hasn’t been upfront with Congress about its performance or its needs.
“It is extremely frustrating to hear the song and dance that we are doing better when the reality is we are not,” said Murray, a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee. “I want to say I’m surprised. But I’m not.”
In many sections of the report, the VA looks past the missed goals to put the best face on its efforts.
Under “Positive 2007 Outcomes,” for example, the VA highlights “accurate claims processing” and said the “accuracy rate ... was maintained at 88 percent, helping to ensure that veterans receive the proper level of monetary benefits.” Only elsewhere does the report note that 88 percent is below the agency’s goal of 98 percent.
The VA reports that 95 percent or more of outpatient visits are scheduled within 30 days of the patients’ desired dates, a fact it has touted to Congress repeatedly. The agency’s inspector general, however, found this year that only 75 percent of the visits it examined took place within 30 days. The VA said it didn’t agree with that finding and was examining the issue.
The VA also claimed that customer-satisfaction ratings by inpatients at VA hospitals are 10 points higher than ratings from private-sector hospitals. In fact, the number the agency used as a comparison is wrong, and as a result the advantage for VA hospitals is half as big as the VA claims.
The VA told McClatchy on Monday that the mistake was made by a “transposition error, and we will be fixing that as soon as possible.”
By CHRIS ADAMS
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON | The Department of Veterans Affairs fell further behind this year in its attempts to give veterans timely decisions on their disability claims, new records show.
The latest numbers are in an annual performance report the VA prepares for Congress. Overall, the agency either has fallen behind or has made no progress in improving its performance in more than half of what it lists as its key goals.
In its speed of processing disability claims, the agency lost ground for the third year in a row.
Moreover, McClatchy Newspapers has found that the VA put a positive spin on many of its numbers and in two instances provided Congress with incorrect or incomplete figures.
The agency said it took an average of 183 days to process a claim in fiscal 2007, longer than in any of the five years tracked in the report. Processing exceeded its 2007 goal of 160 days and its long-term goal of eventually reducing processing time to 125 days.
Congress and veterans closely watch the time it takes the VA to process claims, and the agency has vowed in previous years to pick up the pace. When it was asked about its processing speed last year, for example, the VA told McClatchy that hiring new workers would help it increase production and decrease its backlog of claims in 2007.
In fact, processing time increased by an average of six days, and the backlog of pending claims rose from 377,681 to 391,257, the agency’s records show.
The VA said this week that it was aggressively tackling the issue, hiring more than 1,000 workers, boosting overtime and revamping training. The agency also said it was receiving more disability claims than it had at any time in recent history and that it had received more than it had expected in 2007.
Beyond that, the agency said that meeting or exceeding its goals wasn’t always the best measure of success.
“The VA sets goals to measure how we are doing so that we can continuously improve performance,” said Bob Henke, assistant secretary for management. “We use goals to move and improve performance.”
But for Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, the report is more evidence that the agency hasn’t been upfront with Congress about its performance or its needs.
“It is extremely frustrating to hear the song and dance that we are doing better when the reality is we are not,” said Murray, a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee. “I want to say I’m surprised. But I’m not.”
In many sections of the report, the VA looks past the missed goals to put the best face on its efforts.
Under “Positive 2007 Outcomes,” for example, the VA highlights “accurate claims processing” and said the “accuracy rate ... was maintained at 88 percent, helping to ensure that veterans receive the proper level of monetary benefits.” Only elsewhere does the report note that 88 percent is below the agency’s goal of 98 percent.
The VA reports that 95 percent or more of outpatient visits are scheduled within 30 days of the patients’ desired dates, a fact it has touted to Congress repeatedly. The agency’s inspector general, however, found this year that only 75 percent of the visits it examined took place within 30 days. The VA said it didn’t agree with that finding and was examining the issue.
The VA also claimed that customer-satisfaction ratings by inpatients at VA hospitals are 10 points higher than ratings from private-sector hospitals. In fact, the number the agency used as a comparison is wrong, and as a result the advantage for VA hospitals is half as big as the VA claims.
The VA told McClatchy on Monday that the mistake was made by a “transposition error, and we will be fixing that as soon as possible.”
