The Jabberwocky- a paradigm and description of the IDES.

jabberwocky-childish-288-x-278.jpg
As my later posts explain, the Jabberwocky is a good metaphor for the system that Military Servicemembers and Veterans face in trying to get their due for their service incurred or aggravated disabilities. My follow up post identifies at least 19 different computer programs or websites that must be used in processing an IDES claim on the VA side. As Lewis Carroll wrote, and the military seems to abide by, "All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe." (Doesn't make sense...no worries, it may be that it is not supposed to make sense). It seems that the 19 different systems identified cannot communicate with each other. I will go out on a limb and state that this is both wasteful and inefficient. Worse, I suspect that it causes claims to be erroneously denied and/or unnecessarily delayed).

I would consider asking your Congressman why there are at least 19 different programs implicated in processing an IDES claim.

Jabberwocky
BY LEWIS CARROLL
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

“Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!”

He took his vorpal sword in hand;
Long time the manxome foe he sought—
So rested he by the Tumtum tree
And stood awhile in thought.

And, as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!

One, two! One, two! And through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.

“And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!”
He chortled in his joy.

’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
 
Sorry for the cryptic earlier post....I was just reviewing the VA Regulation on IDES (which is downloadable from the Resource section of this site) M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section D, and noticed a few disturbing points.

There are a plethora of programs/sites that the VA and the military are supposed to use in processing claims. I am not sure I have hit them all- there are so many it is hard to keep track. But, here is a listing that I easily found:

VIP-Veterans Information Portal
CAPRI- Compensation and Pension Records Interchange
CHCS-Composite Health Care System
COVERS- Consolidated Veterans Records System
VTA- Veterans Tracking Application
AHLTA- Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application
SHARE
MAP-D- Modern Award Processing - Development
VERIS- Veterans Examination Request Information System
SAFE- Safe Access File Exchange
ExamTrak- (a web application that allows users to download examination reports they requested through VERIS)
VBMS- Veterans Benefits Management System
VADIR-VA Defense Information Repository
DPRIS- Defense Personnel Records Information Retrieval System
VIS- Veterans Information Solution
PIES- Personnel Information Exchange System
Virtual VA
VCIP- Veterans Claims Intake Program
Planning Systems Support Group’s (PSSG’s) web page

My point is that the VA's rating process for IDES cases relies on using at least 19 different programs or websites to process. I am not a computer genius nor am I an expert in healthcare administration. However, I do know this- having 19 different programs that need to interact with and provide information about a claim is a disaster.

There is a lot of waste and inefficiency going on in the processing of cases. Someone should be held to account.
 
Sorry for the cryptic earlier post....I was just reviewing the VA Regulation on IDES (which is downloadable from the Resource section of this site) M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section D, and noticed a few disturbing points.

There are a plethora of programs/sites that the VA and the military are supposed to use in processing claims. I am not sure I have hit them all- there are so many it is hard to keep track. But, here is a listing that I easily found:

VIP-Veterans Information Portal
CAPRI- Compensation and Pension Records Interchange
CHCS-Composite Health Care System
COVERS- Consolidated Veterans Records System
VTA- Veterans Tracking Application
AHLTA- Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application
SHARE
MAP-D- Modern Award Processing - Development
VERIS- Veterans Examination Request Information System
SAFE- Safe Access File Exchange
ExamTrak- (a web application that allows users to download examination reports they requested through VERIS)
VBMS- Veterans Benefits Management System
VADIR-VA Defense Information Repository
DPRIS- Defense Personnel Records Information Retrieval System
VIS- Veterans Information Solution
PIES- Personnel Information Exchange System
Virtual VA
VCIP- Veterans Claims Intake Program
Planning Systems Support Group’s (PSSG’s) web page

My point is that the VA's rating process for IDES cases relies on using at least 19 different programs or websites to process. I am not a computer genius nor am I an expert in healthcare administration. However, I do know this- having 19 different programs that need to interact with and provide information about a claim is a disaster.

There is a lot of waste and inefficiency going on in the processing of cases. Someone should be held to account.

Wow! Indeed; garbage in, garbage out! ;)

Thus, I quite often comment that "possessing well-informed knowledge is truly a powerful equalizer."

Best Wishes!
 
On my own journeys through both the Army and VA labyrinths, one tenet is glaringly true - By design there is NO ACCOUNTIBILITY.

This is related to my point- with so many different systems relied on to process a claim, it seems built into the system that there would be errors.

Not to say that this is the "best solution." But, a centralized file maintained in one repository, searchable and tabbed, using off the shelf technology, would seem to be just as effective (and likely cheaper) than the "labyrinth" (and almost built in excuse for failures) erected by using all of these different systems that can't communicate with each other. Not that this would work as stated (or would not need tweaks), but the idea/concept holds- how about one central repository (similar to dropbox) containing everything in .pdf format, accessible to and uploadable to by all of the folks who need read/write access as well as being accessible by the Servicemeber/Veteran? I bet this would work better than having 19 different programs (that don't work well or communicate with other programs) likely costing hundreds of millions of dollars to create, update, and administrate.
 
Not to say that this is the "best solution." But, a centralized file maintained in one repository, searchable and tabbed, using off the shelf technology, would seem to be just as effective (and likely cheaper) than the "labyrinth" (and almost built in excuse for failures) erected by using all of these different systems that can't communicate with each other. Not that this would work as stated (or would not need tweaks), but the idea/concept holds- how about one central repository (similar to dropbox) containing everything in .pdf format, accessible to and uploadable to by all of the folks who need read/write access as well as being accessible by the Servicemeber/Veteran? I bet this would work better than having 19 different programs (that don't work well or communicate with other programs) likely costing hundreds of millions of dollars to create, update, and administrate.

That makes too much sense.. why take the time to fix and improve a process we use every day, making it more cost effective and less time consuming. Love it. thanks for the post :)
 
That makes too much sense.. why take the time to fix and improve a process we use every day, making it more cost effective and less time consuming. Love it. thanks for the post :)

If they did implement a fix like this, that would be very cost efficient.

And of course, in this day and age, they would also need to encrypt the data files in order to protect the data from hackers, too.

Knowing this system, even if they did do a fix, they will still be vulnerable to hackers as the health care system repository is way far behind in protecting basic health care data of their clients.

I see this issue as a two-pronged mess - inefficient and unsecure.

V/R,
nwlivewire
 
The Jabberwocky is my favorite poem. I think it explains the whole bureaucratic process as a whole, not just the VA.
 
See, I guess I am still too ingrained in government thought processes lol. To me that is not too horrible albeit unncessary. You clearly by just the names can tell that there are multiple departments that use different programs and once they are done with their portion, they send it to another department. Yes its overkill, yes its grossly inefficient, but even slimming it down, I could see 5-10 programs still left behind.
1. VA exam scheduling-this should be done either by the VA or the contractors should be part of the VA health network-I do not want the scheduling office to have access to my records.-So there is one program
2. Intake-this is an office were records are gathered/appeals are reviewed/paper copies/films are digitized etc.
3. Rating process-once done with intake-this is your claim file-it stays the same no matter where it goes
4. Ebenefits- Receives real time status updates from whatever software your claim package is in, but due to low sec, no records acess
5. DPRIS- is probally their best working software package lol, it could be a module of one of the other systems though, records retrieval is important, but not every record at DMDC is medical related and doctors do not need access to it.

I am pretty certain i only heard about 3 of these as major players during the IDES process, AHLTA (which if course I hope every service has switched to finally), MAP-D, VADIR, and VTA. It is a highly complicated process, with built in excuses for failures, and needs fixing, but everytime they try to fix it, they add more problems lol.
 
The ultimate problem is that all these systems were developed in isolation, were never intended to speak directly with one another, and shoe-horning in the networking code inevitably breaks something, largely because of the myriad laws that must be adhered to, and no one system is intended to adhere to all of those laws.

Witness the OPM system for managing federal retirements:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2014/03/22/sinkhole-of-bureaucracy/

In BOYERS, Pa. — The trucks full of paperwork come every day, turning off a country road north of Pittsburgh and descending through a gateway into the earth. Underground, they stop at a metal door decorated with an American flag.

Behind the door, a room opens up as big as a supermarket, full of five-drawer file cabinets and people in business casual. About 230 feet below the surface, there is easy-listening music playing at somebody’s desk.

This is one of the weirdest workplaces in the U.S. government — both for where it is and for what it does.

Here, inside the caverns of an old Pennsylvania limestone mine, there are 600 employees of the Office of Personnel Management. Their task is nothing top-secret. It is to process the retirement papers of the government’s own workers.

But that system has a spectacular flaw. It still must be done entirely by hand, and almost entirely on paper.

The employees here pass thousands of case files from cavern to cavern and then key in retirees’ personal data, one line at a time. They work underground not for secrecy but for space. The old mine’s tunnels have room for more than 28,000 file cabinets of paper records.

This odd place is an example of how hard it is to get a time-wasting bug out of a big bureaucratic system.

Held up by all that paper, work in the mine runs as slowly now as it did in 1977.

My package submission to the PEB was at least 5 reams of paper, single-sided, including AHLTA printouts. Why? Because not all of it was electronic in the first place. And that's just the way it works.
 
Ouch... gotta bring OPM in. They are fast at saying, yep, regular disability retirement but then DFAS slows up EVERYTHING... My technician packet for disability was 3 reams of paper. My paperwork for the NDR-PEB... 5 reams. Same for my LOD.
 
Sorry for the cryptic earlier post....I was just reviewing the VA Regulation on IDES (which is downloadable from the Resource section of this site) M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart i, Chapter 2, Section D, and noticed a few disturbing points.

There are a plethora of programs/sites that the VA and the military are supposed to use in processing claims. I am not sure I have hit them all- there are so many it is hard to keep track. But, here is a listing that I easily found:

VIP-Veterans Information Portal
CAPRI- Compensation and Pension Records Interchange
CHCS-Composite Health Care System
COVERS- Consolidated Veterans Records System
VTA- Veterans Tracking Application
AHLTA- Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application
SHARE
MAP-D- Modern Award Processing - Development
VERIS- Veterans Examination Request Information System
SAFE- Safe Access File Exchange
ExamTrak- (a web application that allows users to download examination reports they requested through VERIS)
VBMS- Veterans Benefits Management System
VADIR-VA Defense Information Repository
DPRIS- Defense Personnel Records Information Retrieval System
VIS- Veterans Information Solution
PIES- Personnel Information Exchange System
Virtual VA
VCIP- Veterans Claims Intake Program
Planning Systems Support Group’s (PSSG’s) web page

My point is that the VA's rating process for IDES cases relies on using at least 19 different programs or websites to process. I am not a computer genius nor am I an expert in healthcare administration. However, I do know this- having 19 different programs that need to interact with and provide information about a claim is a disaster.

There is a lot of waste and inefficiency going on in the processing of cases. Someone should be held to account.

Hey Jason, here is what those systems do and who they are primarily used by:

1) VIP: This is actually an umbrella term for many of the websites we use. VIS, VBMS (Veterans Benefits Management System), and others are part of this. Think of it like the home page for pebforum and the other websites are the actualy message boards within the site.
2) CAPRI: This is the method for the Veterans Benefits Administration to see Veterans' health records without allowing us writeable access (aka, we are not able to edit clinical notes, etc). This is used by military service coordinators to request examinations through the local VA medical center, and by raters to view any healthcare records in the VA system. Additionally, this system interfaces to a limited ammount with AHLTA so that the VBA can see what is in those records as well. The amount we can see is very very limited, usually only X-ray/MRI/CT results as well as a list of diagnoses and active medications (not the full clinical notes). This is still useful as we, at the VBA, do not have access to AHLTA. They tried giving us access a while back, but there were technical issues wherein they were not able to ensure that VBA employees would be unable to create/edit clinical notes in the system.
3) No idea what this is, I've never used it so I did a quick Google and it appears to be a component or predecessor to AHLTA, the military's side of the electronic healthcare records (EHR) system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_Health_Care_System
4) COVERS: This is purely an application for tracking the location of physical files in the VA. So, for example, when I finish my work on a case I use COVERS to digitally scan that folder into the next workspace, and then walk the folder over. The person receiving the folder then is supposed to scan the folder into their workspace so that, ideally, we know where all the folders are in the VA at all times. This is a stand alone application used solely for tracking of physical files, and one which we are using less and less as nearly all of our non-DES cases are scanned and the folders have been sent to long term storage.
5) VTA: This is an interface website of sorts, where both DoD and the VA track DES participants' progress and input information on their parts of the program. For the VA, it is also used to determine workload plans as it contains the information on how old a case is as well as updated information on any issues with the case (for example, if a claimed issue was not examined).
6) AHLTA: Military EHR, we don't get access to it currently. The ability to see both AHLTA and VA records would go a long way to helping the VA speed up claims processing, but seems to be a thorny issue for DoD and the VA for some reason.
7) SHARE: This is kind of the old master database, and it's something infrequently accessed. The only time we need to get into it is to a) establish the end-product (EP) 689 for a new IDES claim in the VA and b) process the final, monetary award. A rater hardly ever touches this system at the VA, usually all work is done by VSRs (Veterans Service Representatives).
8) MAP-D: This is a development tool for VSR's, MSC's, and RVSR's. Think of it as a collaborative notebook for the VA. The information shown to us is pulled from SHARE (Veteran's name, type of claim, date of claim, dependents, power of attorney, etc). The key use of this is to input work-process notes so that other VA members can view them. An example would be MSC's, who input the list of claimed issues here or that they have received your DD214 and uploaded a scan of it. That keys other people, like raters, to go look for that evidence. This system is, like SHARE, being phased out with the rollout of the web based platform VBMS.
9) VERIS: This is actually a subcomponent of CAPRI, and is the specific application used to request an examination for a Veteran. MSCs/VSRs use this to get the hospital to schedule your exams.
10) SAFE: This is used to exchange documents digitally between DoD and the VA, in particular the PEB case file, proposed rating decision, and any sensitive personal information. There is a file size limit, which is why it is not possible to just upload service treatment records to this and eliminate the paper copies. This is used by PEBLOs, MSCs, and VSRs.
11) ExamTrak: This is used to schedule and download exams conducted by QTC-contracted examiners (private doctors who do exams for the VA on a fee basis). Since these doctors are not VA employees, and are located everywhere in the country, they do not get access to CAPRI so we need to use this system. It's used by raters, VSRs, and MSCs.
12) VBMS: Again, an overarching program with many subprograms. VBMS allows us to rate cases (VBMS-R) and to see all scanned documents in a case whether in virtual VA (legacy e-folder system) or in VBMS itself.
13) VADIR: Used to exchange some EHR info between VA/DoD, mostly used by the doctor side of VA.
14) DPRIS: Used infrequently for 95% of DES cases but extensively for all National Guard and Reservist cases. Often, we need access to your full service admin documents. Some examples: To get the DD214, to verify combat prior to discharge via an award, to get service records from another service department (ie, if the Veteran served first in the Army, then got out and rejoined the Air Force 3 years later we will often only get the Air Force records).
15) VIS: Pulls from SHARE, and is most commonly used to verify service dates because it interfaces with DFAS payouts. Thus, even if we don't have copies of orders to active duty or a DD214 we can usually tell that someone was on some form of active duty. This system then guides us to develop for those orders/214s which we need to verify service/character of discharge.
16) PIES: This is the system used to send a request for documents to the Federal files storage sites for Veterans who served prior to ~1990, or who have retired and are filing a VA claim after a couple years. Used primarily by VSRsfor non-DES cases because everyone going through DES now is still serving or has recently served so their info is available in DPRIS/AHLTA. Much more useful for processing Vietnam/Korean War era claims.
17) Virtual VA: Our first, early 2000s crack at e-folders. Now supplanted by VBMS, but still active because not all MSC's can access VBMS from their workspace.
18) VCIP: This is used to track folders which have been sent to our contractor(s) for digitization(scanning), and doesn't really play a role in claims processing.
19) PSSG web page: I've never even heard of this website/application. A quick Google didn't reveal anything illuminating. I will say that I've never used it, or heard the name or acronym mentioned in the context of DES.

In the end despite the multitude of programs not all of them are regularly used and those which are are kind of important. You'll also notice that we have some legacy programs (MAPD, Virtual VA, SHARE) as we transition to VBMS. I'm directly involved in claims processing, and haven't ever felt hindered by the number of systems. To the point about decreasing accountability, these programs actually seem to aid in accountability. I can tell exactly who last worked on a case, what they did, and where the case is physically and process wise.
 
Real-life story (although I don't actually know which specific systems were responsible);

(IF YOU DON'T LIKE LAUGHING, SCROLL DOWN TO THE PARAGRAPH BEGINNING WITH 'So, to recap...')

July 2011 - Return from deployment with documented TBI. Fort Dix personnel somehow miss this in my medical records AND the medical survey question asking how many blasts I've been exposed to (I answered 4+, they apparently thought that meant zero. Perhaps it's a Jersey thing?)

April 2012 - VA claim submitted for blast-related PTSD, memory problems severe enough that I walked into a home I hadn't even lived in since 2010 (or, TBI for short).

May 2012 - Reserve unit begins the process of kicking me out AND begins first effort to locate me on the same day. Please note that this is nearly a year after redeploying and I've been homeless for two months.

June 2012 - VA places me in a Grant Per Diem homeless shelter run by the Volunteers of America in Hollywood, CA. During my 9 month stay, the Army Reserve continues their attempts to locate me. After 8 months they finally try calling my cellphone.

April 2013 - Upon locating me, the Army Reserve initiates the MEB process and sends me a letter of unfitness. The IDES process is started (Please note April 2012, above - this will become relevant in the next few lines). I am assigned a PEBLO at the location of my MEB at Fort Gordon. My family is also informed and, having moved out of state, comes and gets me. I am no longer homeless.

September 12, 2013 - The VA claim submitted in April 2012 is rated at 50%.

September 15, 2013 - The Fort Carson WTU places me on active duty and orders me to report on September 16 (the following day) from Utah, where I currently live. The WTU also begins the IDES process for me. Again. They also assign me a PEBLO. Again. Because IDES has multiple systems for different regions, the process begun by the Army Reserve at Fort Gordon (Southern Region) does not initially prevent another IDES process from being started at Fort Carson (Western Region). Also, because neither system notifies the VA's rating system, I continue to be paid at the 50% rate for the entire 9 month period I'm on active duty.

February, 2014 - First meeting with Fort Carson PEBLO. She basically tells me that because Fort Gordon already initiated my IDES process, she can't even look me up to tell me my own DOB, and that it would be easier to simply remain in contact with my Fort Gordon PEBLO.

May 2014 - The Fort Gordon IDES process rates me at 50/70, and I receive a retirement date in early July, and retirement orders. The Forst Carson WTU personnel spend the following two months attempting to reduce my rating to 0/0 due to my refusal to behave (behaving in this case can be defined as ignoring/tolerating flagrant and rampant disregard for law, regulation, and common sense) during my stay. This may or may not be related to the legalization of marijuana use in Colorado.

July 1, 2014 - Fort Carson WTU finally accepts the 50/70 rating and allows me to begin clearing. This process is normally given 30 days. I was given 5 due to battalion's withholding my clearing papers (they still hoped to sabotage my rating through a vigorous campaign of phonecalls to Eisenhower AMC personnel at Fort Gordon outlining how annoying it is to have a Soldier who knows the regs and when they're being broken by cadre members).

July 6, 2014 - As Borat would say, 'I am retar-d' (retired...and kinda retarded, but still alive).

July 28, 2014 - I receive a phonecall from my Army Reserve unit demanding to know why I haven't been at drill for over a year. My car nearly runs off the road due to my inability to stop laughing. I inform them that I have been on active duty for 9 months prior to July 6th, and that I am currently retired. I then ask them when to show up for the following month's drill dates. We both decide it best that I not attend drill anymore.

So, to recap...

- The VA medical treatment system can't talk to the VA benefits system very well (but, in their defense, they can talk)

- The Southern Region IDES system can't talk to the Western Region IDES system

- The Army medical records system can't talk to the VA medical records system

- The Army IDES claims system can't talk to the VA non-IDES claims system

- The VA pay system can't talk to the Army pay system (DFAS)

- Army Human Resource Command can't talk to the VA non-IDES claims system

- The Army Reserve can't talk to anybody

- The Fort Carson WTU cadre can't say anything nice, but still continue to say anything at all. And I do mean anything.

- If it weren't for all these communication issues, I'd actually be a lot worse off...thank God the Army/VA's communication is so jacked up (and there's a statement I haven't been able to say out loud many times in my life).

P.S. I know I've spent the lion's share of this talking down the Carson WTU - to clarify, their medical personnel are SECOND TO NONE. But, if you read some of my earlier posts, you'll see that the cadre are allowed/encouraged to pull some of the most asinine shenanigans west of the Mississippi on their junior enlisted Soldiers. Despite cadre's best efforts to keep you down, the medical side will lift you up more.
 
Real-life story (although I don't actually know which specific systems were responsible);

(IF YOU DON'T LIKE LAUGHING, SCROLL DOWN TO THE PARAGRAPH BEGINNING WITH 'So, to recap...')

July 2011 - Return from deployment with documented TBI. Fort Dix personnel somehow miss this in my medical records AND the medical survey question asking how many blasts I've been exposed to (I answered 4+, they apparently thought that meant zero. Perhaps it's a Jersey thing?)

April 2012 - VA claim submitted for blast-related PTSD, memory problems severe enough that I walked into a home I hadn't even lived in since 2010 (or, TBI for short).

May 2012 - Reserve unit begins the process of kicking me out AND begins first effort to locate me on the same day. Please note that this is nearly a year after redeploying and I've been homeless for two months.

June 2012 - VA places me in a Grant Per Diem homeless shelter run by the Volunteers of America in Hollywood, CA. During my 9 month stay, the Army Reserve continues their attempts to locate me. After 8 months they finally try calling my cellphone.

April 2013 - Upon locating me, the Army Reserve initiates the MEB process and sends me a letter of unfitness. The IDES process is started (Please note April 2012, above - this will become relevant in the next few lines). I am assigned a PEBLO at the location of my MEB at Fort Gordon. My family is also informed and, having moved out of state, comes and gets me. I am no longer homeless.

September 12, 2013 - The VA claim submitted in April 2012 is rated at 50%.

September 15, 2013 - The Fort Carson WTU places me on active duty and orders me to report on September 16 (the following day) from Utah, where I currently live. The WTU also begins the IDES process for me. Again. They also assign me a PEBLO. Again. Because IDES has multiple systems for different regions, the process begun by the Army Reserve at Fort Gordon (Southern Region) does not initially prevent another IDES process from being started at Fort Carson (Western Region). Also, because neither system notifies the VA's rating system, I continue to be paid at the 50% rate for the entire 9 month period I'm on active duty.

February, 2014 - First meeting with Fort Carson PEBLO. She basically tells me that because Fort Gordon already initiated my IDES process, she can't even look me up to tell me my own DOB, and that it would be easier to simply remain in contact with my Fort Gordon PEBLO.

May 2014 - The Fort Gordon IDES process rates me at 50/70, and I receive a retirement date in early July, and retirement orders. The Forst Carson WTU personnel spend the following two months attempting to reduce my rating to 0/0 due to my refusal to behave (behaving in this case can be defined as ignoring/tolerating flagrant and rampant disregard for law, regulation, and common sense) during my stay. This may or may not be related to the legalization of marijuana use in Colorado.

July 1, 2014 - Fort Carson WTU finally accepts the 50/70 rating and allows me to begin clearing. This process is normally given 30 days. I was given 5 due to battalion's withholding my clearing papers (they still hoped to sabotage my rating through a vigorous campaign of phonecalls to Eisenhower AMC personnel at Fort Gordon outlining how annoying it is to have a Soldier who knows the regs and when they're being broken by cadre members).

July 6, 2014 - As Borat would say, 'I am retar-d' (retired...and kinda retarded, but still alive).

July 28, 2014 - I receive a phonecall from my Army Reserve unit demanding to know why I haven't been at drill for over a year. My car nearly runs off the road due to my inability to stop laughing. I inform them that I have been on active duty for 9 months prior to July 6th, and that I am currently retired. I then ask them when to show up for the following month's drill dates. We both decide it best that I not attend drill anymore.

So, to recap...

- The VA medical treatment system can't talk to the VA benefits system very well (but, in their defense, they can talk)

- The Southern Region IDES system can't talk to the Western Region IDES system

- The Army medical records system can't talk to the VA medical records system

- The Army IDES claims system can't talk to the VA non-IDES claims system

- The VA pay system can't talk to the Army pay system (DFAS)

- Army Human Resource Command can't talk to the VA non-IDES claims system

- The Army Reserve can't talk to anybody

- The Fort Carson WTU cadre can't say anything nice, but still continue to say anything at all. And I do mean anything.

- If it weren't for all these communication issues, I'd actually be a lot worse off...thank God the Army/VA's communication is so jacked up (and there's a statement I haven't been able to say out loud many times in my life).

P.S. I know I've spent the lion's share of this talking down the Carson WTU - to clarify, their medical personnel are SECOND TO NONE. But, if you read some of my earlier posts, you'll see that the cadre are allowed/encouraged to pull some of the most asinine shenanigans west of the Mississippi on their junior enlisted Soldiers. Despite cadre's best efforts to keep you down, the medical side will lift you up more.

So Basically everything was to Army and VA Standards.... yeeesh!
 
Top